scamdal:

before writing your au, consider the following: 

  • meeting while waiting for hours on end in the emergency room au
  • monopoly night au
  • commiserating on a night shift at mcdonalds au
  • you were the only one that offered to help me move in au
  • marching band au
  • sharing a high school school textbook and leaving each other notes and answers in page corners au
  • working in a museum au
  • panicked yelling in unison because of lost baggage in between connecting flights au

tropicalfruitbabe:

*doesn’t check bank account*
*pretends everything is fine*

deans-demonic-dick-cass-holy-ass:

Why Cockles is more beautiful than J2 or Mishalecki, in my opinion.

When Jensen and Jared are laughing, they are laughing with each other.

When Misha and Jared are laughing, they are laughing at each other.

But,

When Misha and Jensen are laughing, its because they are pleased that they made the other laugh. 

Its. So. Fucking. Beautiful.

oooooh all the ships…*_*

deanwinchesterackles:

J2 or Mishalecki?

Make Me Choose

O.O

Do you ship sastiel
Anonymous

fadingcastiel:

YES. FUCK YES

aND for the record, I also ship Mishalecki

you know, I really am a destiel and cockles shipper, but I am also fond of sastiel.. this ship is so underrated T.T

my-stiel:

Yeah…..right xD

idjitlovespie:

Jared & Misha, JibCon 2014 [x]

texanpadalecki:

In which Jared feels Misha up on stage. X

gereordwyrhta:

barefootdramaturg:

jewlesthemagnificent:

oldtobegin:

velveteenrabbit:

englishpracticenow:

commonly misused words - learn the proper usage of these words to get your way up to any English proficiency exams - IELTS, TOEFL, GRE, etc.

2,000 notes.

JERKING OFF TO THIS

OH GOD LESS VERSUS FEWER THANK YOU FOR ACKNOWLEDGING MY PERSONAL GRAMMATICAL VENDETTA.

By accident. On purpose. Never on accident.

Few native speakers make the less vs. fewer distinction.

Also, this could just be regional, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard an actual person say “by accident” (Ihave read it, however). There is nothing semantically linking the use of the particular preposition “by” to the abstract substantive “accident,” just as there is no semantic link between “on” and “purpose.” “By” implies adjacency, which doesn’t add anything to the meaning of the phrase “by accident”; Why must one be next to and accident but upon a purpose?  There’s no logic linking these words, but rather arbitrary usage, and if usage is the gauge, then both are correct and you can stop being a prescriptivist elitist.

I get a bit of anxiety after seeing this T.T